12:48 PM
Muhammad Zai Khan
Former IRSA chief says dam is not a flood-control project
* ANP says dam would have done immense harm to KP, Sindh
By Iqbal Khattak
PESHAWAR: The Kalabagh Dam – had it been built – would have caused flooding rather than averting it, a former chairman of the Indus River System Authority (IRSA) said on Wednesday, while responding to Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani's recent statement about the dam.
"The dam's effect on floods would have been contrary to what the prime minister claimed," said Fatehullah Khan Gandapur, who headed IRSA from 1993 to 1998.
The KP leadership has criticised the PM's statement, and Information Minister Mian Iftikhar Hussain termed the project "a dead horse". "Kalabagh dam is not a flood-control project," Gandapur said while talking to Daily Times on Wednesday. "It is a run-of-the-river project and its design has to be changed if we want to make it a flood-control project," he said.
Gandapur said the dam's construction would have caused reverse flow in the Kabul River, submerging Nowshera district and water-logging the entire Peshawar valley. "Consultants have called the dam's design a failure," he said.
The Awami National Party is in no mood to compromise on its position over the dam. "Their (pro-dam elements) philosophy is to let the whole of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa drown," senior ANP leader Senator Haji Adeel said. "Why doesn't Islamabad look at other feasible projects instead of only eyeing the Kalabagh Dam, which aims to destroy two provinces?" he asked. "There are other projects that, if undertaken, will help you avoid flood and destruction," he said. "Had the Kalabagh Dam been built, it would have sunk Akora Khattak and Jehangira towns in Nowshera district and its effects would also have been felt in Pabbi town," Adeel said.
"Why don't you build dams from where the water is coming?" he asked, adding that Basha Dam would be able to store 800,000 cusecs and Munda Dam 300,000 cusecs of water.
Source: http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2010\08\12\story_12-8-2010_pg7_2
* ANP says dam would have done immense harm to KP, Sindh
By Iqbal Khattak
PESHAWAR: The Kalabagh Dam – had it been built – would have caused flooding rather than averting it, a former chairman of the Indus River System Authority (IRSA) said on Wednesday, while responding to Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani's recent statement about the dam.
"The dam's effect on floods would have been contrary to what the prime minister claimed," said Fatehullah Khan Gandapur, who headed IRSA from 1993 to 1998.
The KP leadership has criticised the PM's statement, and Information Minister Mian Iftikhar Hussain termed the project "a dead horse". "Kalabagh dam is not a flood-control project," Gandapur said while talking to Daily Times on Wednesday. "It is a run-of-the-river project and its design has to be changed if we want to make it a flood-control project," he said.
Gandapur said the dam's construction would have caused reverse flow in the Kabul River, submerging Nowshera district and water-logging the entire Peshawar valley. "Consultants have called the dam's design a failure," he said.
The Awami National Party is in no mood to compromise on its position over the dam. "Their (pro-dam elements) philosophy is to let the whole of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa drown," senior ANP leader Senator Haji Adeel said. "Why doesn't Islamabad look at other feasible projects instead of only eyeing the Kalabagh Dam, which aims to destroy two provinces?" he asked. "There are other projects that, if undertaken, will help you avoid flood and destruction," he said. "Had the Kalabagh Dam been built, it would have sunk Akora Khattak and Jehangira towns in Nowshera district and its effects would also have been felt in Pabbi town," Adeel said.
"Why don't you build dams from where the water is coming?" he asked, adding that Basha Dam would be able to store 800,000 cusecs and Munda Dam 300,000 cusecs of water.
Source: http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2010\08\12\story_12-8-2010_pg7_2
